The invoice typing, the Monday report, the thing somebody redoes every week. I build it once, put it on a computer you own, and it keeps running after I am gone.
Not a no-code workflow that breaks the day someone moves a menu — real code on a server you own, with logs, alerts and a runbook.
Only the one it is unsure about reaches a person.
Now a check catches it the same day, every day.
Your week fills itself in, on the days you chose.
Hours a week, or someone's salary. I reply the same day with questions, not a pitch.
A small version, the real one, and the real one with monitoring. If it takes longer than I estimated, that is my problem.
Deployed in your name, with alerts, a one-page runbook and the source in your repo. Thirty days of fixes included.
In July my own uploads stopped for a month, and every single run still reported success — because the code checked that it had finished, not that anything had actually been published.
Nothing alerted, because nothing was checking the outcome, only the process. That is the failure mode of almost every automation you have been sold. So every build I ship now checks that the thing actually happened, and tells a human when it did not.
You are being asked for AI content, assistants and automation you cannot staff. I build it under your name, never speak to your client, and finish on time. You resell at your rate. Net-15.
Four of the twelve. No hourly billing, and nothing rented back from me.
Your scheduled job stopped. I find out why, fix it, and add a check so you hear about the next one from me rather than from a customer.
What this includes →A fast website in your name, live in a week. The domain and hosting stay in your name and you pay those providers direct, never me.
What this includes →Invoices, forms and emails become rows in your system. Anything the software is not sure about goes to a person instead of being guessed.
What this includes →One subject becomes a finished, published video in your voice, on the days you choose, without ever repeating itself.
What this includes →For thirty days my pipeline reported a perfect success rate while publishing nothing. Why every run said OK, and the outcome check that replaced the process check.
A config-overlay system so one codebase runs four editorial voices with zero per-channel branching — and why the whole thing runs sequentially on purpose.
How this blog works: posts are markdown files in the site's git repo, rendered client-side. There's no CMS, no database, and no auth system — and yet only I can publish, because publishing is a git push.
My agent started repeating itself. Topic deduplication and visual deduplication turned out to be two different problems that fail in opposite directions.
A sentence or two is enough — what is eating your team's time, or what has broken. I read every message myself and reply the same day with questions and a fixed price.